Zakirowa Svitlana

Value Potential of Symbolism in the Legal Intercultural Legal Communication of Ancient Societies

Abstract: The essence of legal communication as a form of social communication is analysed in the article, тhe structural elements of legal communication are characterized. At the early stages of the development of society and the state, social and legal communication had a high level of symbolism. An important place of communication in the ancient states were temples. Activities of religious institutions was simultaneously focused on the social, religious and legal communication. The study of the universal character of legal symbolism in the period of the formation of law as a social phenomenon was carried. It is proved the value of symbols and features of their use in the socio-legal communications ancient societies. Examples of the combination in legal communication of symbolism and the direct transfer of the formal legal prescription of the state are given. It is underlined that thanks to the use of symbols, not only the interpersonal group communication of contemporaries of certain events occurred, but also the communication of different generations and peoples of the world was possible.

Keywords: communication, legal communication, symbol, symbolism, ancient state.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.46.138     Citation

• Zakirowa Svitlana (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv)

Cite:
Zakirowa Svitlana (2017). Value Potential of Symbolism in the Legal Intercultural Legal Communication of Ancient Societies. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (46) 138-154. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.46.138

References:

1. Poljakov, A. V. (2004). Obshhaia teoriia prava: problemy interpretatsii v kontekste kommunikativnogo podhoda [General theory of law: problems of interpretation in the context of a communicative approach]. St. Petersburg: SPb un-t [in Russian]; Poliakov, A. V. (2011). Normativnost pravovoi kommunikatsii Pravovedenie – Pravovedenie, no. 5, pp. 30–39 [in Russian].
2. Tokarska, A. S. (2011). Komunikatyvna pryroda prava i pravovoi komunikatsii [Communicative nature of Law and legal Communication]. Filosofski ta metodolohichni problemy prava – Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law, no. 1, pp. 32–39 [in Ukrainian].
3. Sytar, I. M. (2014). Komunikatsiia u pravi: do problemy mizhkulturnoi komunikatsii [Communication in law: the problem intercultural communication]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Yurydychni nauky. – Herald of Lviv Polynechnic National University. Law, no. 807, pp. 119–123 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pavlov, V. I. (2014). Ideia pravovoi kommunikatsii i sovremennaia antropologiia prava [The idea of legal communication and modern anthropology of law]. Pravovedenie – Pravovedenie, no. 5, pp. 127–135 [in Russian].
5. Romanenko, E. A. (2010). Voprosy sootnosheniia kommunikatsii i pravovogo obshheniia [Issues of correlation between communication and legal dialogue] Vestnik KrasGA–The Bulletin of KrasGAU, no. 12, pp. 149–154. [in Russian].
6. Dzialoshinskii, I. M. (Ed.) (2011). Simvoly v kommunikatsii [Symbols in Communication]. [in Russian].
7. Hranchak, T. (2012). Biblioteka i politychna komunikatsiia [Library and political communication]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
8. Andrieiev, D. V. (2013). Vytoky ta paradyhmy sotsialno-pravovoi komunikatsii [Origins and paradigms of social and legal kommunication]. Pravo i Bezpeka – Law and Security, no. 2, pp. 6–12 [in Ukrainian].
9. Sannikov, S. V. Genezis i tipologija potestarno-pravovyh simvolov germanskih «varvarskih korolevstv»: k postanovke problemy [The genesis and typology of the potestarian-legal symbols of the german «barbarian kingdoms»: the formulation of the problem]. [in Russian].
10. Goncharova, N. (2016). Simvolizm v prave [Symbolism is the right]. Vestnik VGU. Serija: Pravo – Proceedings of VSU. Series: Law, no. 1, pp. 91–97. [in Russian].
11. Sherkova, T. A. Drevneegipetskie perehodnye obriady v kontekste Jungianskoi psihologii [Ancient Egyptian transitional rites in the context of Jungian psychology]. [in Russian].
12. Rubanik, V. E. (2011). Istoriia gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnyh stran [History of state and law of foreign countries]. St. Petersburg : Piter [in Russian].
13. Drevneegipetskaia «Kniga Mertvyh» (1994). (M. A. Chegodaev, Trans). Voprosy istorii – Issues of History, no. 8, pp. 145–163; no. 9, pp. 141–151. Retrieved from http://pstgu.ru/download/1180370552.mertvyh.pdf [in Russian].
14. Zakony vavilonskogo tsaria Hammurapi [Laws of the Babylonian King Hammurabi]. [in Russian].
15. Turaev, B. (2015). Zakony Hammurapi [Laws of Hammurabi]. [in Russian].
16. Gaj. Institucii [Institutes of Roman Law].(F. Dydynskii, Trans.) [in Russian].
17. Khoma, N. M. (2003). Istoriia derzhavy ta prava zarubizhnykh krain [History of state and law of foreign countries]. Kyiv : Karavela : Novyi Svit-2000, Lviv : Mahnoliia plius [in Ukrainian].
18. Krylati vyslovy [Site of Winged expressions]. [in Ukrainian].