Medvedieva Anzhelika

Bibliometric Systems as an Instrument of Monitoring and Support Studies

Abstract: With the development of new information technologies new approaches to the creation and dissemination of information and knowledge embodied in their lives by creating intellectual products and new solutions are launched. Today intensive development of the information society and increased public demand for qualitative information have caused increasing general public interest in the problem of bibliometric research definition. Objective assessment of efficiency of bibliometric research, increase or termination of funding is closely associated with the choice of criteria that determine the effectiveness of the research organizations and individual researchers.

Keywords: Libraries, databases, bibliometrics, science.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.48.384     Citation

• Medvedieva Anzhelika (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv)

Cite:
Medvedieva Anzhelika (2017). Bibliometric Systems as an Instrument of Monitoring and Support Studies. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (48) 384-395. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.48.384

References:

1. Zhabin, O. (2016). Bibliometria ta alternativny metriky [Bibliometrics and alternative metrics]. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoi biblioteky Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho – Transactions of V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, issue 43, pp. 296–311 [in Ukrainian].
2. Bredikhin, S. V., Kuznetsov, A. Y. (2012). Metody bibliometrii i rinok elektronnoi nauchnoi periodiki [Methods of bibliometrics and the market of electronic scientific periodicals]. Novosibirsk: IVMIMG SB RAS, NEKOM [in Russian].
3. Varshavskii, A. (2011). Metodologicheskie problemy mezhdunarodnogo sravnitelnogo analiza rezultatov nauchnoy deyatelnosti [Methodological problems of the international comparative analysis of the results of scientific activity]. Innovatsionnaia politika – Innovative Policy. pp. 407–441. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
4. Redkina, N. S. (2003). Bibliometria: istoriia i sovremennost [Bibliometry: History and Modernity]. Molodye v bibliotechnom dele – Young in the Library Business, no 2, pp. 76–86 [in Russian].
5. Marshakova, Y. V. (1988). Systema tsytyrovanyia nauchnoi literatury kak sredstvo slezhenyia za razvitiem nauki [The system nauchnoy literature citation slezhenyya As funds for the development of science]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
6. Lazarev, V. S. (1991). Bibliometria [Bibliometry]. Voprosy bibliohrafovedeniia i bibliotekovedeniia – Questions of Bibliography and Library Science, issue 12, pp. 3–18. Minsk [in Russian].
7. Pavlovskaia, E. Y. (1990). Informatsionnie metody otsenki tendentsii razvitiia nauchnikh napravleniy [Information methods for assessing trends in the development of scientific directions]. Itohi nauki i tekhniki. Seriia. Informatika – Results of Science and Technology. Series: Informatics, Vol. 17, pp. 3–12 [in Russian].
8. Kostenko, L. (2014). Bibliometryka ukrainskoi nauky: informatsiino-analitychna systema [Bibliometryka Ukrainian science: information-analytical system]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk – Library Journal, no 4, pp. 8–12. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Simonenko, T. V. (2017). Bibliometria v razvitii komunicatsiy Mezhdunarodnoy asociacii akademiy nauk [Bibliometrics in the development of communications of the International Association of Academies of Sciences]. Biblioteki natsionalnykh akademii nauk: problemy funktsionirovaniia, tendentsii razvitiia – Libraries of National Academies of Sciences: Problems of Functioning, Development Trends, pp. 27–33 [in Russian].
10. Stoliarevskaia, A. (2009). Informatsionniy poisk v Internete – ot SMART do Google [Information search on the Internet – from SMART to Google]. Novyi kolehium – New Collegium, no 1, pp. 63–72 [in Russian].
11. Google Scholar.
12. Wormell, I. (2000). Bibliometric Analysis of the Welfare State Topic. Scientometrics, no 43 (2), pp. 203–236 [in English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005696722014
13. Ingwersen, P. (2014) Scientific Datasets: Informetric Characteristics and Social Utility Metrics for Biodiversity Data Sources. Library and Information Sciences [in English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54812-3_8
14. Garfield, E. (2016). Citation indexes: from the Science Citation Index to the Web of Science. bid.ub.edu. [in English].
15. Scimago Journal and Country Rank. [in English].
16. Journal metrics. [in English].
17. OpenDOAR: Directory of Open Access Repositories. [in English].