Potikha Andrii

Methodological Basis for Study Political Parties Media as an Object of Library-Informational Activity

Abstract: The paper deals with certain features of methodological basis for study of Ukrainian political parties media as an object of library-informational activity, and applying of various methodological approaches, analysis of its effectiveness as well. This made possible the conclusion on impact of applying communicative issues of methodological complex in library studies. Dialectical method is its basis, its components are systematic, informational, structural and functional, institutional, comparative, historical, terminological approaches and the whole complex of scientific, particular and special methods, while social and communicational approach is the most important and resultative one. The use of such a set of methods ensures the study of library role in processing and preserving the information of party mass media, functions, technological processes, development of funds in political and communicative processes as a system. Importance of conducting research of specifics of functioning and tasks of library units involved in the study of media information is emphasized.

Keywords: research methodology, library studies, information, parties mass media.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.49.171     Citation

• Potikha Andrii (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv)

Cite:
Potikha Andrii (2018). Methodological Basis for Study Political Parties Media as an Object of Library-Informational Activity. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (49) 171-182. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.49.171

References:

1. Voskoboinikova-Huzieva, O. V. (2007). Dyskusiini pytannia rozvytku teorii i metodolohii bibliotekoznavstva [Discussion issues in the development of the theory and methodology of library science]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk – Library Bulletin, Vol. 2, pp. 3–7. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
2. Dubrovina, L. A. (2005). Metodolohichni zasady istorychnykh doslidzhen v bibliotekoznavstvi ta dokumentoznavstvi: bazovi pryntsypy i poniattia [Methodological foundations of historical research in librarianship and document science: basic principles and concepts]. Bibliotekoznavstvo.Dokumentoznavstvo. Informolohiia – Library Science. Documentation. Informology, Vol. 1, pp. 22–30. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. Ivanov, V. F. (1994) Kontent-analiz [Content analysis]. Kiev [in Russian].
4. Ilganaeva, V. A. (2009). Sotcialnye kommunikatsii (teoriia, metodologiia, deiatelnost): slovar-spravochnik [Social communications (theory, methodology, activity): a dictionary-reference]. Kharkiv: KP «Gorodskaia tipografiia» [in Russian].
5. Mangeim, D. B., Rich, R. K. Politologiia: Metody issledovaniia [Political Science: Research Methods]. (1997). Moscow: Ves Mir [in Russian].
6. Mankevich, I. A. Sotcialno-kommunikatsionnyi podkhod v sisteme kulturologicheskogo znaniia [Socio-communication approach in the system of cultural knowledge]. (2001). Proceedings of the Conference Title Methodology of humanitarian knowledge in the perspective of the XXI century. On the occasion of the 80 th birthday of Professor Moses Samoilovich Kagan ’01: Mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia koferentciia (18 maia 2001 g., Sankt-Peterburg) – International scientific conference, ser. Symposium, issue 12, pp. 83–87 [in Russian].
7. Markova, V. A. (2011). Knyzhkova komunikatsiia: teoriia, istoriia, perspektyvy rozvytku [Book communication: theory, history, prospects of development]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis.Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
8. Stoliarov, Iu. N. (2006).Nauchnyi mif o spetsialnykh metodakh dokumentalno-kommunikatsionnykh distsiplin [The scientific myth about special methods of document and communication disciplines].Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki – Scientific and Technical Libraries, Vol. 10 [in Russian].
9. Shemaieva, H. V. (2009). Biblioteka v systemi naukovoi komunikatsii: koevoliutsiini protsesy rozvytku [Library in the system of scientific communication: co-evolutionary processes of development]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis.Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].