Cherpak Tetyana

Features of Political Communication in Modern Ukraine in the Conditions of Development of Information Society

Abstract: The practice of power and political communications in modern Ukraine is analyzed. The feature of this practice is inadequate use by the authorities of communicative opportunities available in relations with civil society. Thus, problematic aspects in this sphere have been identified, and it requires careful examination to achieve optimal results of interaction between the state and society, especially in the context of crisis situations in the country (similar to the one which Ukraine currently experiences).

Keywords: political communication, public, power, crisis, information technologies.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.49.056     Citation

• Cherpak Tetyana (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv)

Cite:
Cherpak Tetyana (2018). Features of Political Communication in Modern Ukraine in the Conditions of Development of Information Society. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (49) 56-68. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.49.056

References:

1. Arev nazval teleobrashchenyia Yatseniuka predvybornoi ahytatsyei [Aryev called Yatsenyuk’s television appeals election campaigning] [in Russian].
2. Barezhev, K. Krizisnyie kommunikatsii: sut, naznachenie, tekhnolohii [Crisis communications: essence, purpose, technologies] [in Russian].
3. Hanzhurov, Yu. (2017). Parlamentsko-uriadova komunikatsiia yak model politychnoho dyskursu [Parliamentary-governmental communication as a model of political discourse]. Scientific notes of the Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies to them. IF Kuras, no. 89 [in Ukrainian].
4. Granchak, T. (2012) Biblioteka I politychna komunikatsiya [Library and political communication]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Kovalevskyi, V. (2015). Politychna komunikatsiia yak instrument podolannia kryzovykh yavyshch [Political communication as an instrument for overcoming crisis phenomena][in Ukrainian].
6. Kochubei, L. (2009). Osoblyvosti politychnykh komunikatsii v umovakh rozvytku tekhnolohii informatsiinoho suspilstva [Features of political communications in the development of information society technologies] [in Ukrainian].
7. Matsiezhynskyi, V. (2006). Public relations v perekhidnyi period [Public relations in the transition period]. S. Vynnychenko (Trans). Lviv [in Ukrainian].
8. Nedbai, V. (2009). Suchasni politychni komunikatsii: mediino-tekhnolohichnyi aspekt [Modern political communications: the media-technological aspect]. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
9. Pocheptsov, H. (2001). Kommunikativnye tekhnolohii dvadtsatoho veka [Communicative technologies of the twentieth century]. Kiev [in Russian].
10. Pocheptsov, H. (2001). Teoriia kommunikatsii [The theory of communication]. Kiev [in Russian].
11. Solovev, A. (2004). Politicheskie kommunikatsii [Political communications]. Moscow [in Russian].
12. Shvartsenberg, R.-Zh. (1992). Politicheskaia sotsiologiia [Political Sociology]. Moscow [in Russian].
13. Yablonskyi, V. (2016). Komunikatsiia orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady Ukrainy: vyklyky ta zavdannia [Communication of the state authorities of Ukraine: challenges and tasks]. Implementation of communication between public authorities. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
14. Yakovlieva, N. (2016). Osoblyvosti politychnoi komunikatsii v umovakh ukrainskykh vnutrishnoderzhavnykh kryz [Features of political communication in the conditions of Ukrainian internal crises] [in Ukrainian].
15. Boydstun, A. E., Hardy, A., Walgrave, S. (2014). Two Faces of Media Attention: Media Storm Versus Non-Storm Coverage Political Communication no. 4, pp. 509–531 [in English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.875967
16. Crisis leadership. Guiding the organization though uncertainty and chaos [in English].
17. The Politics of Crisis Management. Public Leadership under Pressure [in English].