Zakirova Svitlana

Institutions of Direct Democracy in the Construction of Communication Processes and Strategic Communications (Historical-Retrospective Parallels)

Abstract: This article focuses on a principles of functioning of institutions of direct democracy as the way of authorities and population communication in ancient states and Kievan Rus. From the point of view of the strategic tasks of the state, the institutions of democracy created opportunities to build specific communication technologies to legitimize power decisions through the activities of the people's assembly and the people's veche. Proposals for reforming the state or political system of ancient Athens or the Roman Republic were considered by the people's assembly. At the time of Kievan Rus communication with the population in the form of a people's veche in a similar way legitimized not only the decision of the authorities, but also the power itself.

Keywords: communication, strategic communications, direct democracy, democracy, people’s assembly, veche.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.53.227     Citation

• Zakirova Svitlana (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-7210

Cite:
Zakirova Svitlana (2019). Institutions of Direct Democracy in the Construction of Communication Processes and Strategic Communications (Historical-Retrospective Parallels). Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (53) 227-241. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.53.227

References:

1. Shkliaruk, M. (2018). Struktura stratehichnykh komunikatsii u systemi demokratychnoho derzhavnoho upravlinnia [The structure of strategic communications in the system of democratic public administration]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok – State Administration: Improvement Anddevelopment, no. 1.
2. Tykhomyrova, Ye. B. (2017). Stratehichni komunikatsii yak odyn z priorytetiv hlobalnoi stratehii zovnishnoi polityky i bezpeky YeS [Strategic communications as one of the priorities of the global strategy of the foreign policy and security of the EU]. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. Seriia: Politychni nauky – International Relations. Series: Political sciences, no. 14.
3. Zakirov, M. (2019). Stratehichni komunikatsii u suchasnomu sviti [Strategic communications in the modern world]. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoi biblioteky Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho – Transactions of V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, issue 52, pp. 24–34 [in Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.52.024
4. Hranchak, T. (2012). Biblioteka i politychna komunikatsiia [Library and political communication]. Kyiv.
5. Pocheptsov, H. (2012). Novi komunikatyvni mozhlyvosti u sferi derzhavnoho upravlinnia [New communicative opportunities in the sphere of public administration]. MediaSapiens.
6. Kuchabskyi, O. H., Bazhynova, O. A. (2012). Mekhanizmy komunikatsii vlady ta hromadskosti v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Mechanisms of public and authorities communication in the context of globalization]. Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka – Public Administration: Theory and Practice, issue 51, pp. 196–201.
7. Lohunova, M. (2007). Znachennia politychnykh komunikatsii u zdiisnenni derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Value of political communications in realization of state administration]. Personal – Personnel, no. 11.
8. Zakirov, M. B., Zakirova, S. G. (2009). Istorija gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnyh stran. Drevnij mir [History of state and law of foreign countries. Ancient world]. Lugansk [in Russian].
9. Kovryzhenko, D. S. (Eds.). (2007). Referendumy v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi [Referendums in the European Union]. Kyiv.
10. Shapoval, Yu. (Eds.). (2011). Politychna entsyklopediia [Political Encyclopedia]. Kyiv: Parlamentske vydavnytstvo [in Ukrainian].
11. Hrushevskyi, M. S. (2015). Tvory: u 50 t. [Works in 50 vol.]. T. 22. Narys istorii ukrainskoho narodu [Essay on the history of the Ukrainian people]. Lviv.
12. Dovnar-Zapolskij, M. V. (1906). Politicheskbj stroj drevnej Rusi: veche i knjaz [The political system of ancient Rus: veche and prince]. Moscow.
13. Bondar, M. (2014). Viche yak peredumova stanovlennia ta rozvytku referendumiv [Veche as a prerequisite for the formation and development of referendum]. Yurydychnyi visnyk – Law Herald, issue 2, pp. 45–49.
14. Yermolaiev, V. (2002). Viche v Kyivskii Rusi: pytannia kompetentsii (IX – seredyna XII st.) [Veche in Kyivan Rus: question of competense (9th − mid.of the 12th century)]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy – Journal of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, issue 4 (31), pp. 45–55.
15. Kostomarov, N. I. (1904). Sobranie cochinenij N. I. Kostomarova: istoricheskie monografii i issledovanija [Collection of Works by N. I. Kostomarov: Historical Monographs and Studies]. Book 3. Vol. VII–VIII. Severorusskija narodopravstva vo vremena udelno-vechevogo uklada. (Istorija Novgoroda, Pskova i Vjatki) [Severorussky of the people in the days of the specific veche way of life. (History of Novgorod, Pskov and Vyatka)]. Sankt-Peterburg.
16. Vilkul, T. L. (2001). Viche v Davnii Rusi u druhii polovyni XI–XIII st. [Veche in Ancient Rus in the second half of 11th − 13th century]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainan].