Kotsiubovska Halina

Structural and Communicative Features of Coordinating Structures as a Language Universal

Abstract: The article presents analysis of formally-grammatical and semantic nature of syntactic units, semantic and structural organization of text as single unit of higher order that is one of pressing questions of modern linguistic science. In particular, syntactic and semantic connection and facilities of its expression are studied on interphrase and interindention level. The article contains an attempts to identify common to Ukrainian and Russian linguistics approaches to studying the phenomenon of coordinating. The article deals with the interpretation of coordinating as one of the types of syntactic connection and its differentiation with parceling.Elements that the article contains complement and develop opinion expressed earlier, lights up it from a new side and has for an object to spread some details, explanations. The most expressive and identical for the East Slavonic languages features of constructions with this type of connection are analyzed. Among the signs of coordinating, the elements to be joined are singled out in the form of the final components of a dialogical unity, repetitions of lexical and syntactical com- ponents of the statement, and remote location. The specificity of one of the structural types of constructions with coordinating that has its own formal coordinating indicators, is investigated. The analysis of qualitative composition of means of grammatical expression of this connection is made.An attempt to solve the problem of the joining not on the basis of separate theoretical positions that answer the features of concrete language, comes true, on the supervisions got as a result of research of the problem on material of different languages. Research of joining constructions in a comparatively-language plan is positioned in-process as fruitful and perspective, as these constructions in an interlingual aspect have a row of general signs foremost structural. Interlingual similarity of these constructions that is traced in different aspects obviously, is non-random and can be examined as proof of general tendency in development of syntactic subsystems of different family languages, that can be defined as a tendency to democratization of language.

Keywords: coordinating, syntactic connection, grammatical means of connection, coordinating conjunctions, semantics of coordinating units.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.59.079     Citation

• Kotsiubovska Halina (National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine, Ukraine, Dnipro) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3298-8060

Cite:
Kotsiubovska Halina (2020). Structural and Communicative Features of Coordinating Structures as a Language Universal. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (59) 79-90. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.59.079

References:

1. Babajceva, V. V. (2011). Sintaksicheskij status prisoedinennyh komponentov [Syntactic status of the added components] / V. V. Babajceva // Russkij jazyk v shkole [Russian is at school]. No. 5. – pp. 71–77 [in Russian].
2. Burak, L. I. Prisoedinenie i ego differencial’nye priznaki [Joining and his differential signs] / L. I. Burak // Russkij jazyk: Mezhvedomstvennyj sbornik [Russian: Interdepartmental collection]. – Minsk, issue 8, pp. 60–70 [in Russian].
3. Valgina, N. S. (2000). Sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo jazyka [Syntax of modern Russian] / N. S. Valgina. – M. : Agar, 416 p. [in Russian].
4. Horodenska, K. H. (2010). Spoluchnyky ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy [Unions of literary Ukrainian] / K. H. Horodenska. – K., Instytut ukrainskoi movy: Vydavnychyi dim Dmytra Buraho, 208 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Huivaniuk, N. V. (1999). Formalno-semantychni spivvidnoshennia v systemi syntaksychnykh odynyts [Formally-semantic correlations are in the system of syntactic units] / N. V. Huivaniuk. – Chernivtsi, 336 p. [in Ukrainian].
6. Hurko, O. (2014). Pryiednuvalni konstruktsii yak zasib implikuvannia stverdzhennia [Joining constructions as means of expressions statement] / O. Hurko // Ridnyi krai [Native edge]. No. 2 (31) – pp. 117–119 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zviahina, H. O. (2014). Status pryiednuvalnykh konstruktsii u khudozhnomu movlenni Hryhora Tiutiunnyka [Status of joining constructions is in the artistic broadcasting of Hryhir Tiutiunnyk] / H. O. Zviahina // Aktualni problemy prykladnoi linhvistyky [Issues of the day of the applied linguistics]: vyp. 1: [zb. nauk. prats]. – Odesa: vydavets Bukaiev Vadym Viktorovych, pp. 173–178 [in Ukrainian].
8. Kobzev, P. V. (1965). Prisoedinitel’nye konstrukcii kak raznovidnost’ nepolnyh predlozhenij [Joining constructions as variety of incomplete suggestions]/ P. V. Kobzev // Voprosy teorii i metodiki prepodavanija russkogo jazyka. Uch. zap. LGPI. [Questions of theory and methodology of teaching of Russian] L., vol. 258. – pp. 55–74 [in Russian].
9. Lomov, A. M. (2007). Slovar’-spravochnik po sintaksisu sovremennogo russkogo jazyka [Reference Dictionary-book on the syntax of modern Russian]/ A. M. Lomov. – M. : AST: Vostok – Zapad, 416 p. [in Russian].
10. Rinberg, V. L. (1987). Konstrukcii svjaznogo teksta v sovremennom russkom jazyke [Constructions of coherent text in modern Russian language] / V. L. Rinbegr. – L’vov, 168 p. [in Russian].
11. Sevrjugina, E. V. Sposoby grammaticheskogo i punktuacionnogo vyrazhenija prisoedinitel’noj svjazi [Methods of grammatical and punctuation expression of joining connection] / E. V. Sevrjugina // Kommunikativnye kompetencii [Communicative competenses] – pp. 160–164.
12. Serbina, T. G. Diferenciacija priednuval’nih ta parcel’ovanih konstrukcij v istorichnomu ekskursi [Differentiation of joining and parceling constructions is in historical digression] / T. G. Serbina // Naukovi zapiski. Serija "Filologichna" vip.10 [Scientific messages. Series are "Philological"]. – pp. 124–133 [in Ukrainian].
13. Sidorova, E. G. (2012). Prisoedinitel’nye konstrukcii v sisteme sovremennogo russkogo jazyka [Joining constructions are in the system of modern Russian] / E. G. Sidorova // Funkcionirovanie russkogo jazyka: Vestn. Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 2. Jazykozn. [Functioning of Russian: Announcer Volgograd state university. Series. 2. Linguistics] – (2012). – No. 2 (16), – pp. 57–62 [in Russian].
14. Tursunov, B. N. (1993). Prisoedinenie kak osobyj tip sintaksicheskoj svjazi [Joining as special type of syntactic connection] [Tekst]: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk / B. N. Tursunov. – SPb, – 36 p. [in Russian].
15. Ukrainska mova: entsyklopediia [Ukrainian: encyclopaedia] / [red.- uporiad. V. M. Rusanivskyi, O. O. Taranenko (spivholovy), M. P. Ziabliuk ta in. – [2-e vyd. vypr. i dop.]. Kyiv : Ukrainska entsyklopediia, 2004. – 824 p. [in Ukrainian].
16. Shafiro, M. E. (1961). Nekotorye osobennosti slovoraspolozhenija i struktury konstrukcij s prisoedinitel’noj svjaz’ju [Some features of word-orders and structures of constructions with joining connection] / M. E. Shafiro // Voprosy russkogo jazykoznanija [Questions of Russian linguistics]. – Saratov, pp.109–126 [in Russian].