Клименко О. - Кодифікація вивчення бібліотеки як об'єкта бібліотекознавства в системі наукових комунікацій, Сокур О. (2020)

  ARCHIVE (All issues) /     Content (2020, Issue 60)Ukrainian English

Klymenko Oksana, Sokur Olena

Codification of Library Study as an Object of Library Science

Abstract: The article presents the codification of current approaches to the study of the library as an object of library science. Codification solves two interrelated tasks ‒ the refinement of content and form, means the official recognition, description and systematization of the basic directions of modern library science for its development and meets the most important needs of today. Within the current approaches, a systematic approach has been elaborated, which helped to substantiate the study of the library as a systematic object of library science, whose integral components are interdependent elements, and a model approach to the study of library interaction, as a complex open dynamic system and its separate sub-systems. The development of scientific libraries as a system, which is inherent in enhancing the unity and interdependence of all its elements, needs to be studied from the standpoint of a systematic approach. Neither library fund, nor users, nor staff, nor material and technical facilities it its own, nor even their interactions, viewed in isolation from one another, yet form the library as a coherent system. An organic whole is formed only when there are stable interconnections between these subsystems, which gives the system integrative qualities. A modern library is a system with internal and external interactions and connections between them, which is focused on external query, organization of library information resource, library services and products. The presented business model takes into account the individual characteristics of libraries, their ability to correspond to modern ideas about the library of the knowledge society. The argument is made that the works presented in the light of the problem presented in the headline, on the one hand, do not actually consider the interaction of libraries as the basis of its mission, and, on the other, represent library multifaceted evolution as an object of librarianship in time and space in context of social transformations.

Keywords: library science, object of library science, library, function, model, system.



Author(s) citation:

Cite:
Klymenko Oksana (2020). Codification of Library Study as an Object of Library Science. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (60) 49-61. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.60.049


References:

  1. Antonov, V. M., Nesterenko, V. H., Antonova-Rafi, Yu. V. (2013). Hibrydni akmeolohichni biblioteky v Ukraini (innovatsiini tekhnolohii ta zastosuvannia) [Hybrid Acmeological Libraries in Ukraine (Innovative Technologies and Applications)]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Publishing and printing center "Kyiv University" [in Ukrainian].
  2. Artemov, Yu. I. (2010). Kontseptualna model biblioteky suspilstva znan [Conceptual model of the knowledge society library]. Naukovi pratsi Derzhavnoi naukovo-pedahohichnoi biblioteky Ukrainy im. V. O. Sukhomlynskoho – Transactions of V. Suchomlynsky State Scientific and Pedagogical library of Ukraine, 2, 66–71 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Brui, O. M. (2018). Zbalansovana systema pokaznykiv u stratehichnomu upravlinni bibliotekoiu [Balanced Scorecard in Strategic Management of Library]. Candidate's thesis. V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  4. Vaneev, A. N. (2004). Byblyotechnoe delo. Teoriia. Metodika. Praktika [Librarianship. Theory. Methodology. Practice]. St. Petersburg: Professiia [in Russian].
  5. Voskoboinikova-Huzieva, O. V. (2014). Stratehii rozvytku bibliotechno-informatsiinoi sfery Ukrainy: henezys, kontseptsii, modernizatsiia [Strategies of library-informative sphere of Ukraine: genesis, conceptions, modernization]. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka [in Ukrainian].
  6. Davydova, I. O. (2014). Upravlinnia systemnymy transformatsiiamy bibliotek: do pytannia naukovoi orhanizatsii upravlinnia [Management of systemic transformations of the library: on the issue of science-based organization of management]. Visnyk Kharkivskoi derzhavnoi akademii kultury – Visnyk of Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, 45, 78–84 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Kartashov, N. S. (1978). Vzaimodeistvie nauchnyh bibliotek kak faktor naibolee polnogo udovletvoreniia informacionnyh potrebnostei uchenyh i spetcialistov [Interaction of scientific libraries as a factor of the most complete satisfaction of scientists' and specialists' information needs]. Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis. State Order of Lenin Library of the USSR, Moscow [in Russian].
  8. Kunanets, N. (2013). Sotsiokomunikatyvnyi pidkhid u doslidzhenni istorii bibliotechnoi spravy zakhidnoukrainskoho rehionu [Socio-communicative approach in the study of the history of librarianship in the Western Ukrainian region]. Visnyk KNUKiM. Ser.: Sotsialni komunikatsii – Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. Series: Social Communications, 1, 114–119 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Yarmachenko, M. D. (Ed.). (2001). Pedahohichnyi slovnyk [Pedagogical dictionary]. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
  10. Rizun, V. (2012). Nacherky do metodolohii doslidzhen sotsialnykh komunikatsii [Outlines for the methodology of social communication research]. Psykholinhvistyka – Psycholinguistics, 10, 305–314 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Slobodianik, M. S. (2003). Sistemno-funktcionalnaia model biblioteki [System-functional model of the library]. In Libraries and Associations in a Changing World: New Technologies and New Forms of Collaboration. Library and information accessibility in the modern world: electronic resources for science, culture and education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Crimea 2003" (Ch. 2, pp. 759–760), Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology. Moscow [in Russian].
  12. Sokolov, A. V. (1988). Informacionnyi podkhod k dokumentalnoi kommunikatcii [Information approach to documentary communication]. Leningrad: LGIC [in Russian].
  13. Stoliarov, Ju. N. (2002). Biblioteka – dvukhkonturnaia sistema [The library is a dual-circuit system]. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki – Scientific and Technical Libraries, 11, 5–24 [in Russian].
  14. Shynkaruk, V. I. (at al.) (Ed.). (2002). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Philosophy]. Kyiv: Abrys [in Ukrainian].
  15. Havkina, L. B. (1926). Nauchnaia razrabotka voprosov bibliotekovedeniia [Scientific development of library science]. In Trudy pervoi konferentcii nauchnyh bibliotek – Proceedings of the First Conference of Scientific Libraries. (pp. 29–33). Moscow [in Russian].
  16. Shraiberg, Ja. L. (2002). Sovremennye tendencii razvitija bibliotechno-informacionnyh tehnologij: ezhegodnyj doklad [Current Trends in the Development of Library and Information Technologies: Annual Report]. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki – Scientific and Technical Libraries, 1, 25–47 [in Russian].